美国

Department of Justice says Yale discriminates against White and Asian students

作者 美华 422 阅读 0 评论
【Chinese Version】 On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation...

Chinese Version

 

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation of federal civil rights law.

 

The Department of Justice found that “race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions” and that Yale rejects “scores of Asian American and White applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.” The announcement follows a two-year investigation into Yale undergraduate admissions that began with complaints filed by the Asian American Coalition for Education (AACE). The DOJ threatened to sue the University if it does not modify its policies for the 2020-2021 and all upcoming admissions cycles.

 

“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” said Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, in the press release. “Dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division.”

 

Dreiband echoes the famous quote from Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discrimination on the basis of race.” In opposition to her colleague and in defense of affirmative action, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor wrote, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race, and to apply the Constitution with eyes open to the unfortunate effects of centuries of racial discrimination.”

 

Policies like race conscious affirmative action exist to remedy the “stereotypes, bitterness and division” that Dreiband, and the DOJ under the Trump administration, fail to recognize are the direct result of this country’s history of systemic racial inequity. Systemic racial discrimination cannot be remedied without present, positive, and ongoing anti-racist policies.

 

By singling out affirmative action policies while willfully ignoring the objectionable nature of other racist policies such as legacy admissions, the DOJ letter manipulates Asian-American interests in order to position our community against other communities of color. The letter is part of an ongoing series of efforts by the Trump administration to undermine affirmative action policies in higher education.

 

“This announcement is pure politics,” says Anurima Bhargava, the former Chief of the Educational Opportunities Section of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ under the Obama administration, “a signal once again that the Trump administration will take extraordinary steps to protect white privilege and resort to unfounded racial attacks.”

 

The DOJ is the agency responsible for enforcing federal law in the United States. It is headed by current attorney general, William Barr, who was appointed by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The DOJ under the Trump administration has been widely criticized for becoming a political instrument that protects Trump and his allies.

 

Given 20 years of judicial precedent and four Supreme Court rulings in favor of affirmative action, it is unlikely that the DOJ letter has the legal basis to force Yale into compliance. In an email to the student body on Thursday evening, Yale President Peter Salovey dismissed the department’s allegations as “baseless” and upheld the University’s holistic admissions process. Salovey indicated that Yale College will not change its admissions processes in response to the letter.

 

The more pressing fallout from the letter, then, is how we in the Chinese-American community will allow the news to influence our personal conversations and ongoing understandings of affirmative action and other race-conscious policies. From advocating for the integration of Chinese-born students into San Francisco public schools in 1885 to continuing conversations surrounding Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, from last year’s lawsuits against reforming the special admissions process for New York City’s elite high schools to the upcoming vote on ACA-5 in California, Chinese-Americans have been vocal on both sides of the affirmative action argument. 

 

As participants in this society, we must speak openly and candidly about race and take responsibility for confronting inequality. The spirit of the Chinese-American community response will continue to be decisive in debates for racial equity in education and elsewhere throughout our nation.

 

Keep an eye out for The WeChat Project’s new affirmative action series, starting with an article on ACA-5. In the meantime, revisit our previous article on Systemic Racism.

Written by: Dora Guo

Dora Guo is a current undergraduate student at Yale University.

 

评论

加入讨论

请登录后发表评论

还没有评论

登录成为第一个评论的人。

Related Posts

U.S.

川普撤销对国税局100亿美元诉讼,司法部设立17.76亿美元“基金”——参议员沃伦称其“腐败程度令人发指”

美国司法部5月18日宣布设立一个总额17.76亿美元的“反武器化基金”,与总统川普撤销对国税局100亿美元诉讼相关联。该基金旨在赔偿自称在拜登政府时期遭联邦政府“武器化”对待的人士,但批评者指其实际可能用于补偿2021年1月6日国会大厦袭击案被告及川普政治盟友。前国务卿希拉里·克林顿斥其为“秘密基金”,参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦称其“腐败程度令人发指”。基金由一个五人委员会管理,其中四名成员由司法部长、川普前辩护律师托德·布兰奇任命,且无需国会批准即可从财政部判决基金中支取款项,引发权力分立和公共资金滥用的广泛争议。

2026年5月19日
U.S.

【快讯】马斯克输了!联邦法院驳回其对OpenAI诉讼:告得太晚了

美国加州奥克兰联邦法院于5月18日驳回了埃隆·马斯克对人工智能公司OpenAI及其首席执行官萨姆·奥特曼和总裁格雷格·布罗克曼提起的诉讼。为期三周的庭审后,由九人组成的陪审团在不到两小时内做出一致裁决,认定马斯克在2024年提起诉讼时,已超过了法定的诉讼时效。马斯克曾是OpenAI的联合创始人,他指控该公司背弃了其作为非营利组织、致力于人工智能造福人类的初衷,并在他不知情的情况下转向了盈利模式。OpenAI及其高管则辩称,公司从未承诺永久保持非营利性质,并认为马斯克提起诉讼是为了争夺控制权并推广其竞争对手xAI。法官伊冯娜·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯接受了陪审团的咨询裁决,正式驳回了马斯克的所有诉讼请求。马斯克对此裁决表示不满,称其为“技术性驳回”,并誓言将继续上诉。

2026年5月18日
U.S.

法国爱泼斯坦案调查新进展:约10名新受害者浮出水面

法国检察官近日披露,自今年2月成立特别工作组调查杰弗里·爱泼斯坦及其网络以来,已有约10名此前未知的受害者站出来。巴黎首席公诉人劳尔·贝库表示,调查人员正梳理爱泼斯坦的电脑、电话记录和地址簿,并将寻求国际协助。此案已牵涉多名法国及国际知名人士,包括前文化部长雅克·朗、已故模特经纪人让-吕克·布吕内尔等。美国司法部此前发布的“爱泼斯坦文件”是触发法国调查的关键因素。

2026年5月18日