美国

Department of Justice says Yale discriminates against White and Asian students

作者 美华 • • 1170 阅读 • 0 评论
【Chinese Version】 On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation...

【Chinese Version】

 

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Yale University’s undergraduate admissions process “illegally discriminates” against White and Asian students in violation of federal civil rights law.

 

The Department of Justice found that “race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions” and that Yale rejects “scores of Asian American and White applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.” The announcement follows a two-year investigation into Yale undergraduate admissions that began with complaints filed by the Asian American Coalition for Education (AACE). The DOJ threatened to sue the University if it does not modify its policies for the 2020-2021 and all upcoming admissions cycles.

 

“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” said Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, in the press release. “Dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division.”

 

Dreiband echoes the famous quote from Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discrimination on the basis of race.” In opposition to her colleague and in defense of affirmative action, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor wrote, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race, and to apply the Constitution with eyes open to the unfortunate effects of centuries of racial discrimination.”

 

Policies like race conscious affirmative action exist to remedy the “stereotypes, bitterness and division” that Dreiband, and the DOJ under the Trump administration, fail to recognize are the direct result of this country’s history of systemic racial inequity. Systemic racial discrimination cannot be remedied without present, positive, and ongoing anti-racist policies.

 

By singling out affirmative action policies while willfully ignoring the objectionable nature of other racist policies such as legacy admissions, the DOJ letter manipulates Asian-American interests in order to position our community against other communities of color. The letter is part of an ongoing series of efforts by the Trump administration to undermine affirmative action policies in higher education.

 

“This announcement is pure politics,” says Anurima Bhargava, the former Chief of the Educational Opportunities Section of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ under the Obama administration, “a signal once again that the Trump administration will take extraordinary steps to protect white privilege and resort to unfounded racial attacks.”

 

The DOJ is the agency responsible for enforcing federal law in the United States. It is headed by current attorney general, William Barr, who was appointed by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The DOJ under the Trump administration has been widely criticized for becoming a political instrument that protects Trump and his allies.

 

Given 20 years of judicial precedent and four Supreme Court rulings in favor of affirmative action, it is unlikely that the DOJ letter has the legal basis to force Yale into compliance. In an email to the student body on Thursday evening, Yale President Peter Salovey dismissed the department’s allegations as “baseless” and upheld the University’s holistic admissions process. Salovey indicated that Yale College will not change its admissions processes in response to the letter.

 

The more pressing fallout from the letter, then, is how we in the Chinese-American community will allow the news to influence our personal conversations and ongoing understandings of affirmative action and other race-conscious policies. From advocating for the integration of Chinese-born students into San Francisco public schools in 1885 to continuing conversations surrounding Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, from last year’s lawsuits against reforming the special admissions process for New York City’s elite high schools to the upcoming vote on ACA-5 in California, Chinese-Americans have been vocal on both sides of the affirmative action argument. 

 

As participants in this society, we must speak openly and candidly about race and take responsibility for confronting inequality. The spirit of the Chinese-American community response will continue to be decisive in debates for racial equity in education and elsewhere throughout our nation.

 

Keep an eye out for The WeChat Project’s new affirmative action series, starting with an article on ACA-5. In the meantime, revisit our previous article on Systemic Racism.

Written by: Dora Guo

Dora Guo is a current undergraduate student at Yale University.

 

评论

加入讨论

请登录后发表评论

还没有评论

登录成为第一个评论的人。

Related Posts

U.S.

梅根父亲托马斯·马克尔在佛州被控持有儿童性虐待图像

82岁的托马斯·马克尔(Thomas Markle Sr.)周五上午在佛罗里达州坦帕市郊外被联邦探员逮捕,被控一项持有儿童性虐待图像罪。联邦起诉文件称,探员搜查了他在洛杉矶地区租用近二十年的两个仓储单元,查获约78件物品,包括幻灯片、胶片底片和书籍,内有疑似儿童性虐待图像。马克尔周五下午在坦帕联邦法院首次出庭,随后在电子监控条件下获释。若罪名成立,他最高可被判处20年联邦监禁;他否认指控。

2026年11月7日
U.S.

迈阿密法官永久驳回川普对《华尔街日报》百亿美元诉讼

迈阿密联邦地区法官达林·盖尔斯周六以“有偏见驳回”方式,永久驳回美国总统川普针对《华尔街日报》、其母公司道琼斯及鲁珀特·默多克提起的100亿美元诽谤诉讼。案件源于该报刊登的一篇文章,报道一封据称由川普写给杰弗里·爱泼斯坦、收录于爱泼斯坦50岁生日相册的信。盖尔斯裁定,修订后的起诉书仍未充分陈述法律要求的“实际恶意”,并指出报道已告知读者川普否认写信、称信件是伪造。法官援引最高法院1964年“纽约时报诉沙利文案”,并称起诉书试图“制造”调查报道的缺陷;永久驳回意味着相同指控不得再次提起。

2026年11月1日
U.S.

哥伦比亚特区与弗吉尼亚州起诉阻止川普凯旋门项目

哥伦比亚特区与弗吉尼亚州总检察长布莱恩·施瓦尔布和杰伊·琼斯周六向联邦法院提起联合诉讼,要求在施工开始前叫停美国总统川普推动的纪念性凯旋门,并要求政府先取得国会授权。诉状称项目“公然违法”且“在法律上站不住脚”,警告三年施工将阻碍通勤、拖慢紧急车辆,并造成波托马克河污染和雨水径流。白宫官员称,工程最早可能于下周、约11月5日破土。此案使反对该项目的诉讼增至三起。

2026年11月1日